This week, I had the review article regarding Multiple
Sclerosis, which can be found at this link: http://www.mult-sclerosis.org/news/Nov2002/FullTextInflammationinMS.html.
First, some background about the disease. Multiple Sclerosis is a chronic
autoimmune disease that attacks myelin sheaths of axons in the central nervous
system. Symptoms range from numbness, balance and coordination problems, bladder dysfunction, bowel dysfunction, pain,
sexual dysfunction, emotional changes, depression, paralysis and loss of
vision. How this disease progresses, the severity, and the specific symptoms
vary from person to person and are very unpredictable, making it difficult to
study. The cause of MS is unknown, yet researchers think there might be some
genetic factors. Some interesting theories that have been disproved are owning
a dog, allergies, exposure to heavy metals, physical trauma, and aspartame.
Although a viral cause is still being researched, there is no evidence yet that
supports this. MS is 2-3 times more
likely in women than men, with most people diagnosed between ages 20-50. In all
parts of the world, MS is more common further away from the equator, which has
led to some research on a possible link between MS and vitamin D. MS is most
common in Caucasians of northern European ancestry. Although there is no cure
yet, treatment exists to manage symptoms and prevent flare-ups. Rehabilitation
is also very important in managing this disease. A website that I found,
located at http://www.nationalmssociety.org/index.aspx, was very helpful and
informative about this disease.
The article looked at the role of inflammation in Multiple
Sclerosis and argued that not all inflammatory processes involved are
detrimental. The researchers begin the article with a more in depth look at the
pathogenesis of MS. The demylinated areas of the CNS contains inflammatory
filtrates with myelin specific T cells, B cells secreting anti-myelin
antibodies, and many nonspecific mononuclear cells. The chronic inflammation in MS is caused by
proretention and prosurvival factors prevent the apoptosis or emigration of
these inflammatory cells. MS can basically be thought of as an inflammatory
process that does not resolve. Here's how it happens: cerebral endothelial cells regulate traffic
and play an important role in maintaining the integrity of the blood brain
barrier. Patients with MS have abnormal endothelial tight junctions, increasing
leakiness and permeability. The damaged BBB allows mononuclear cells to enter the
brain, and the inability to clear them results in an aggregation of
lymphocytes, activating local immune cells like microglia and astrocytes. This
sets the stage for an immune reaction in the CNS. The activated microglia act
as phagocytes and begin to demyelinate the axons. The accumulation of
leukocytes ultimately ends up with tissue hyperplasia, demyelination, axonal
loss and astrocytic scarring. In the final mechanisms of damage, macrophages
phagocytize myelin, anti-myelin antibodies are secreted, and release of myelin
toxic cytokines as well as nitric oxide.
I found the title of this article to be very fitting,
because inflammation in MS is both good, bad, and extremely complex. The
immense complexities of the inflammatory processes involved in MS can explain
why so many of the treatments described in this review were unsuccessful or
even dangerous. One of the major
complexities that I see with MS is that to treat this disease, the Central
Nervous System must be accessed through the blood-brain barrier. Introducing
things into the BBB, even if they could help, can be very dangerous and can
cause many different side effects. Because there are so many interactions
between immune cells in this disease, any treatment is likely to affect many
more processes than the one it is intended for. This makes research and
treatment very complex indeed. To anyone wanting to do research in this field,
your contributions are much needed and you are a brave soul!
First off, great job on presenting such an overwhelming topic. Understanding the complexity of MS is enough to give someone MS! What confuses me is how the relapsing-remitting MS occurs. From my understanding and personal theory, the nerves can regain myelin, which can cause improvements; however, the speed of recovery cannot match the rate of deterioration, which is what causes the relapse. There seems to be a variety of environmental factors that cause relapse as well, which is understandable, as environmental conditions can affect the immune system. I’m also assuming that when someone with MS progresses into the later stages where relapse doesn’t occur, it’s because the rate of myelin improvement cannot even pale in comparison to the rate of deterioration. Does anyone else have any other ideas?
ReplyDeleteI also did some research regarding the prediction of MS relapses and even this was rather complex and relatively unknown. A study from Ohio State University uncovered the molecule miR-29, which could have some answers regarding relapse. MiR-29 is responsible for regulating Th1 cells and when uncontrolled, autoimmune issues occur. Researchers are hoping that miR-29 can be used as a reliable marker for the prediction of when relapse occurs. Although the actual mechanism they discuss is way over my head, the concept is sound. By being able to predict a relapse, treatments can be made more efficient and designed for only when a relapse is about to occur, rather than constantly taking high levels of corticosteroids during an acute attack.
This disease is quite a disease…
I have been very interested in the disease multiple sclerosis ever since we did a case study on it in my cellular physio class I took last year. Like Richard mentioned, you did a thorough job covering most (at least what we know) of the key characteristics of the disease.
ReplyDeleteI thought it was interesting that you mentioned the microglia, when activated in this disease, act essentially as phagocytes that demyelinate axons. Since microgila are members of the innate immune system and MS is essentially a disease revolving around Tcell lymphocytes, I did a little research in microglia's role in multiple sclerosis. I found the following paper to be fairly good at explaining their role.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15948188
It mentions them acting as an antigen-presenting cell, promoting the inflammation by propagating more specific antigen-directed responses. I also found that in their duty to act as "phagocytes" in the disease development process, they release effector molecules such as reactive nitrogen species. These attribute to CNS tissue damage, specifically to the oligodendrocytes. This is just another example that adds to the extreme complexity of the disease and I agree that research contributions are much needed in this field as the discovery for its cause and mechanism involve endless possible pathways.
Thanks for looking this up, Colin. I find it interesting just how many cells take part in the inflammatory processes of MS, even in cells like microglia. It is hard to keep track of all the processes, let alone try to treat them. Great explanation!
DeleteI was looking at the possibility of other diseases being connected to MS and I found this article: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15596619
ReplyDeleteJulia, you stated that researchers thought that the cause of MS might be genetic. Well, according to this article, there seem to be some hints as to its connection with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), which is a genetic disease. I cannot say it better than the authors of the article, so I've pulled out the two most important sentences that summarize the findings of this article and support the statement that researchers do, indeed, believe that MS is a genetic disease.
"The CAH diagnosis was subsequently confirmed by the detection of a homozygote N172I mutation of the CYP21 gene on chromosome 6."
"The CYP21 gene is located within the HLA complex locus on chromosome 6p21, which is one of the genetic regions related to MS susceptibility."
It seems that the CYP21 gene on our 6th chromosome is a pretty important determinant when it comes to multiple sclerosis AND congenital adrenal hyperplasia.
This having been an article from 2004 likely opened some doors for other researchers to step through.
This research definitely shows progress in locating the responsible mutation behind multiple sclerosis. Based on my article this week, focusing on treatments, I hope that locating the source of the problem will lead to better treatments. Because it is so complicated, treating anything other than the direct source is really ineffective. This is really promising! Thanks for looking it up!
Delete